Skip to content
GRE Math overview

Public topic · GRE Math

Differential Equations Domain Guide

How the GRE Mathematics differential-equations domain fits together: existence and uniqueness, the homogeneous-plus-particular structure, the Wronskian, linear systems solved by eigenvalues, and long-run behaviour from equilibria.

Concise answer

Linear differential equations have a rigid architecture: the solution set of the homogeneous equation is a vector space whose dimension equals the order, and the nonhomogeneous solution set is that space shifted by any one particular solution. Everything else is method — an integrating factor for first-order linear equations, characteristic roots for constant coefficients, eigenvalues for systems — and the questions that are not about method are about long-run behaviour, which is read off signs rather than solved for.

Definitions

Order and linearity
The order is the highest derivative present; the equation is linear when yy and its derivatives appear only to the first power and are not multiplied together.
General versus particular solution
The general solution carries as many arbitrary constants as the order; a particular solution is any single member of the family.
Superposition
For a linear homogeneous equation, any linear combination of solutions is again a solution — this is what makes the solution set a vector space.
Wronskian
W=y1y2y1y2W = y_1 y_2' - y_1' y_2 for two solutions of a second-order linear equation; the solutions are independent on an interval exactly when WW is nonzero there.
Autonomous equation and equilibrium
y=f(y)y' = f(y), with no explicit tt. Its equilibria are the roots of ff, and each is a constant solution.
Linear system
x=Ax\vec{x}' = A\vec{x} with AA constant. Solutions are built from eigenvalue–eigenvector pairs of AA.

Intuition

A linear differential operator behaves exactly like a matrix: the homogeneous solutions are its kernel, and solving a nonhomogeneous equation is solving Ly=gL y = g — one particular solution plus anything in the kernel. That is why an nn-th order linear equation has exactly nn arbitrary constants, and why 'find the general solution' means 'find a basis for the kernel and one particular solution'.

Constant coefficients turn calculus into algebra. Substituting y=erxy = e^{rx} converts the differential equation into a polynomial equation in rr, so the whole solution structure — exponential growth, oscillation, resonance — is read from the roots. Systems are the same trick with x=eλtv\vec{x} = e^{\lambda t}\vec{v}, where the polynomial equation becomes the eigenvalue problem for AA.

Many exam items never ask for a solution at all. They ask what happens as tt \to \infty, or whether an equilibrium is stable. Those are sign questions: negative real parts pull solutions to zero, positive real parts push them away, and a scalar equilibrium is stable exactly when the slope of ff there is negative.

Concept walkthrough

Classification comes first because it determines everything downstream. Write the order, then whether the equation is linear, then whether the coefficients are constant, then whether it is homogeneous. A first-order equation that is separable is solved by separating; one that is linear is solved by an integrating factor μ=ep\mu = e^{\int p} after normalising the leading coefficient to 11; some equations are both, and either route works. Second order with constant coefficients goes to the characteristic polynomial. Anything else on this exam is usually recognisable as a Cauchy–Euler equation x2y+bxy+cy=0x^2 y'' + bxy' + cy = 0, which is solved by trying y=xry = x^r.

Existence and uniqueness is examined mainly through its failure. For y=f(x,y)y' = f(x,y) with y(x0)=y0y(x_0) = y_0, continuity of ff near the point gives a solution, and continuity of f/y\partial f / \partial y as well gives uniqueness. Remove the second hypothesis and uniqueness genuinely breaks: y=y2/3y' = y^{2/3} with y(0)=0y(0) = 0 is solved both by y0y \equiv 0 and by y=(x/3)3y = (x/3)^3, because f/y=23y1/3\partial f/\partial y = \tfrac{2}{3}y^{-1/3} blows up at y=0y = 0. Linear equations are better behaved — for y+p(x)y=q(x)y' + p(x)y = q(x) with p,qp, q continuous on an interval, the solution through any point exists and is unique on that whole interval.

The structure theorem organises second-order work. For ay+by+cy=g(x)ay'' + by' + cy = g(x), first solve ay+by+cy=0ay'' + by' + cy = 0 via ar2+br+c=0ar^2 + br + c = 0: distinct real roots r1r2r_1 \ne r_2 give c1er1x+c2er2xc_1 e^{r_1 x} + c_2 e^{r_2 x}; a repeated root rr gives (c1+c2x)erx(c_1 + c_2 x)e^{rx}; complex roots α±βi\alpha \pm \beta i give eαx(c1cosβx+c2sinβx)e^{\alpha x}(c_1 \cos \beta x + c_2 \sin \beta x). Then add any particular solution of the full equation. Undetermined coefficients supplies that particular solution when gg is a polynomial, exponential, sine/cosine, or product of these — but if the trial form already solves the homogeneous equation, multiply it by xx (or x2x^2 for a repeated root). This resonance adjustment is one of the most reliably tested points in the domain.

Independence of solutions is checked with the Wronskian W=y1y2y1y2W = y_1y_2' - y_1'y_2. If W0W \ne 0 at even one point of the interval, the two solutions are independent and together span the solution space; Abel's identity shows that for y+p(x)y+q(x)y=0y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = 0 the Wronskian is W(x)=W(x0)epW(x) = W(x_0)e^{-\int p}, so it is either identically zero or never zero — which is why a single evaluation settles the question.

Systems are where linear algebra re-enters. For x=Ax\vec{x}' = A\vec{x}, substituting x=eλtv\vec{x} = e^{\lambda t}\vec{v} gives (AλI)v=0(A - \lambda I)\vec{v} = \vec{0}, so λ\lambda must be an eigenvalue and v\vec{v} a corresponding eigenvector. With nn independent eigenvectors the general solution is cieλitvi\sum c_i e^{\lambda_i t}\vec{v}_i. Complex eigenvalues α±βi\alpha \pm \beta i produce spirals: real solutions are eαte^{\alpha t} times sines and cosines of βt\beta t. A repeated eigenvalue with too few eigenvectors produces a generalised eigenvector and a solution containing teλtt e^{\lambda t} — the exact analogue of the repeated-root factor of xx in the scalar case.

Qualitative behaviour is often the whole question. For a system, if every eigenvalue has negative real part all solutions decay to the origin (asymptotically stable); if any has positive real part the origin is unstable; one positive and one negative gives a saddle, and purely imaginary eigenvalues give closed orbits around a centre. For a scalar autonomous equation y=f(y)y' = f(y), the equilibria are the roots of ff, and an equilibrium yy^* is stable when f(y)<0f'(y^*) < 0 and unstable when f(y)>0f'(y^*) > 0 — the sign chart of ff is a complete phase line. The logistic equation y=ry(1y/K)y' = ry(1 - y/K) with r,K>0r, K > 0 illustrates both: y=0y = 0 is unstable and y=Ky = K is stable, so every solution starting positive tends to KK without any formula being needed.

After this page, you should be able to

  • Classify an equation and choose its method from the classification alone.
  • State the existence-and-uniqueness hypothesis and give an equation whose solution is not unique because that hypothesis fails.
  • Use the homogeneous-plus-particular structure to shortcut nonhomogeneous problems, including the resonance case where the trial solution needs an extra factor of xx.
  • Test two candidate solutions for independence with the Wronskian.
  • Solve x=Ax\vec{x}' = A\vec{x} by eigenvalues and read the phase portrait type from the signs of those eigenvalues.
  • Determine stability of an equilibrium of y=f(y)y' = f(y) from the sign of ff' there, without solving the equation.

Formulas and assumptions

Existence and uniqueness for a first-order IVP

y=f(x,y), y(x0)=y0:f continuousexistence;f,fy continuousuniquenessy' = f(x,y),\ y(x_0) = y_0: \quad f \text{ continuous} \Rightarrow \text{existence}; \quad f, \tfrac{\partial f}{\partial y} \text{ continuous} \Rightarrow \text{uniqueness}

Variables

  • f: the right-hand side
  • (x0, y0): the initial point

Assumptions

  • Continuity is required on a rectangle around the initial point, not everywhere.
  • The conditions are sufficient, not necessary; failure permits but does not force non-uniqueness.

Integrating factor for a first-order linear equation

μ(x)=ep(x)dx,(μy)=μq,y=1μ(μqdx+C)\mu(x) = e^{\int p(x)\,dx}, \qquad (\mu y)' = \mu q, \qquad y = \frac{1}{\mu}\left(\int \mu q \,dx + C\right)

Variables

  • p(x): the coefficient of y in standard form
  • q(x): the forcing term

Assumptions

  • The equation must first be divided through so the coefficient of y' is 1.
  • p and q are continuous on the interval of interest.

Solution structure for linear equations

y=yh+yp,Lyh=0,Lyp=gy = y_h + y_p, \qquad L y_h = 0, \quad L y_p = g

Variables

  • L: a linear differential operator
  • g: the forcing term

Assumptions

  • The equation must be linear; superposition fails otherwise.
  • y_h carries as many arbitrary constants as the order of the equation.

Undetermined coefficients with resonance

g=eαxyp=Aeαx;if eαx solves Ly=0yp=Axeαxg = e^{\alpha x} \Rightarrow y_p = Ae^{\alpha x}; \quad \text{if } e^{\alpha x} \text{ solves } Ly=0 \Rightarrow y_p = Axe^{\alpha x}

Variables

  • g: the forcing term
  • A: the undetermined coefficient

Assumptions

  • Applies to constant-coefficient equations with forcing terms of the listed types.
  • A sine or cosine forcing term requires both sine and cosine in the trial solution.

Wronskian and Abel's identity

W=y1y2y1y2,W(x)=W(x0)ex0xp(t)dtW = y_1 y_2' - y_1' y_2, \qquad W(x) = W(x_0)\,e^{-\int_{x_0}^{x} p(t)\,dt}

Variables

  • y1, y2: two solutions of the same second-order linear equation
  • p: the coefficient of y' in standard form

Assumptions

  • Abel's identity requires the equation in standard form with continuous coefficients.
  • Because the exponential is never zero, W is either identically zero or never zero on the interval.

Linear systems by eigenvalues

x=Axx(t)=icieλitvi\vec{x}' = A\vec{x} \Rightarrow \vec{x}(t) = \sum_i c_i e^{\lambda_i t}\vec{v}_i

Variables

  • lambda_i: eigenvalues of A
  • v_i: corresponding eigenvectors

Assumptions

  • A must be constant; the formula needs enough independent eigenvectors.
  • A deficient repeated eigenvalue introduces a term containing t times the exponential.

Stability from signs

Reλi<0 ix0;f(y)<0y stable\operatorname{Re}\lambda_i < 0 \ \forall i \Rightarrow \vec{x} \to \vec{0}; \qquad f'(y^{*}) < 0 \Rightarrow y^{*} \text{ stable}

Variables

  • lambda_i: eigenvalues of the coefficient matrix
  • y*: a root of f

Assumptions

  • The scalar test is inconclusive when f'(y*) = 0; the sign chart of f must be used directly.
  • Stability is a statement about nearby initial conditions, not about all of them.

Cauchy–Euler equation

x2y+bxy+cy=0  r(r1)+br+c=0,y=xrx^{2}y'' + bxy' + cy = 0 \ \Rightarrow \ r(r-1) + br + c = 0, \quad y = x^{r}

Variables

  • b, c: constants
  • r: the exponent to solve for

Assumptions

  • Valid on an interval avoiding x = 0, where the equation is singular.
  • A repeated root r gives the second solution x^r ln x, mirroring the factor of x in the constant-coefficient case.

Worked example

A linear system solved and classified

Solve x(t)=Ax(t)\vec{x}'(t) = A\vec{x}(t) for A=(1221)A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 2 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, and describe the behaviour of solutions as tt \to \infty.

  1. 1Look for solutions of the form x=eλtv\vec{x} = e^{\lambda t}\vec{v}. Substituting gives λeλtv=Aeλtv\lambda e^{\lambda t}\vec{v} = A e^{\lambda t}\vec{v}, so (AλI)v=0(A - \lambda I)\vec{v} = \vec{0}: λ\lambda must be an eigenvalue of AA and v\vec{v} an eigenvector.
  2. 2Characteristic polynomial: det(AλI)=(1λ)24=λ22λ3=(λ3)(λ+1)\det(A - \lambda I) = (1-\lambda)^2 - 4 = \lambda^2 - 2\lambda - 3 = (\lambda - 3)(\lambda + 1), so λ=3\lambda = 3 and λ=1\lambda = -1. Check against the invariants: tr(A)=2=3+(1)\operatorname{tr}(A) = 2 = 3 + (-1) and det(A)=14=3=3(1)\det(A) = 1 - 4 = -3 = 3 \cdot (-1).
  3. 3Eigenvector for λ=3\lambda = 3: (A3I)v=0(A - 3I)\vec{v} = \vec{0} reads 2v1+2v2=0-2v_1 + 2v_2 = 0, so v=(1,1)T\vec{v} = (1,1)^T. Eigenvector for λ=1\lambda = -1: (A+I)v=0(A + I)\vec{v} = \vec{0} reads 2v1+2v2=02v_1 + 2v_2 = 0, so v=(1,1)T\vec{v} = (1,-1)^T.
  4. 4The eigenvalues are distinct, so the two eigenvectors are independent and span R2\mathbb{R}^2. The general solution is x(t)=c1e3t(11)+c2et(11)\vec{x}(t) = c_1 e^{3t}\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} + c_2 e^{-t}\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix}.
  5. 5Verify one piece directly: for x=e3t(1,1)T\vec{x} = e^{3t}(1,1)^T, x=3e3t(1,1)T\vec{x}' = 3e^{3t}(1,1)^T, while Ax=e3t(1+2,2+1)T=3e3t(1,1)TA\vec{x} = e^{3t}(1 + 2, 2 + 1)^T = 3e^{3t}(1,1)^T. They agree.
  6. 6Long run: et0e^{-t} \to 0 and e3te^{3t} \to \infty. Any solution with c10c_1 \ne 0 grows without bound, asymptotically along the line spanned by (1,1)(1,1); the solutions with c1=0c_1 = 0 decay to the origin along (1,1)(1,-1). One positive and one negative eigenvalue is precisely a saddle, so the origin is unstable.

x(t)=c1e3t(1,1)T+c2et(1,1)T\vec{x}(t) = c_1 e^{3t}(1,1)^T + c_2 e^{-t}(1,-1)^T. The origin is an unstable saddle: solutions blow up along (1,1)(1,1) unless c1=0c_1 = 0, in which case they decay to the origin along (1,1)(1,-1).

Common traps

  • Reading off p(x)p(x) before normalising. In xy+2y=x2x y' + 2y = x^2 the integrating factor comes from p=2/xp = 2/x, not from 22.
  • Writing a repeated characteristic root as c1erx+c2erxc_1 e^{rx} + c_2 e^{rx}. That is one solution with a renamed constant; the second independent solution is xerxxe^{rx}.
  • Omitting the extra factor of xx in undetermined coefficients when the trial form already solves the homogeneous equation — the resonance case.
  • Losing constant solutions when separating. Dividing by h(y)h(y) discards every yy with h(y)=0h(y) = 0, and those are genuine solutions.
  • Assuming an initial-value problem always has a unique solution. y=y2/3y' = y^{2/3}, y(0)=0y(0) = 0 has both y0y \equiv 0 and y=(x/3)3y = (x/3)^3, because f/y\partial f/\partial y is unbounded at y=0y = 0.
  • Judging stability from the trace alone. tr(A)<0\operatorname{tr}(A) < 0 with det(A)<0\det(A) < 0 is a saddle and unstable.
  • Mishandling a negative discriminant: the roots of r24r+13r^2 - 4r + 13 are 2±3i2 \pm 3i, not 2±32 \pm 3.
  • Using undetermined coefficients on an equation with non-constant coefficients, where the method does not apply.

Question depth and domain coverage vary by exam. Practice answers are checked after submission.

Sources

  1. GRE Subject Test Content and StructureETS. Accessed 2026-07-06. Use as a cited source for exam facts; do not imply affiliation or reproduce protected test material.
  2. Calculus Volume 2, Section 4.1: Basics of Differential EquationsOpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-15. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.
  3. Calculus Volume 2, Section 4.3: Separable EquationsOpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-15. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.
  4. Calculus Volume 2, Section 4.5: First-order Linear EquationsOpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-15. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.
  5. Calculus Volume 3, Section 7.1: Second-Order Linear EquationsOpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-15. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.
  6. Calculus Volume 3, Section 7.2: Nonhomogeneous Linear EquationsOpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-15. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.

Sources and corrections

Sources last checked 2026-08-15

Every source cited on this page was checked on the date shown, and we update the page when a source changes. If something looks wrong, tell us and we'll recheck it.