Skip to content
GRE Physics overview

Worked example

Free to read

De Broglie Wavelength of an Accelerated Electron

A public atomic-physics question on turning an accelerating voltage into a de Broglie wavelength, using the momentum of the electron rather than the photon energy relation.

Question

An electron starts from rest and is accelerated through a potential difference of 150V150\,\text{V}. What is its de Broglie wavelength? (Use hc1240eVnmhc \approx 1240\,\text{eV}\cdot\text{nm} and mec25.11×105eVm_ec^2 \approx 5.11\times 10^{5}\,\text{eV}.)

  1. a.0.0024nm0.0024\,\text{nm}
  2. b.0.10nm0.10\,\text{nm}
  3. c.0.14nm0.14\,\text{nm}
  4. d.8.3nm8.3\,\text{nm}

Correct answer

B. 0.10nm0.10\,\text{nm}

Full reasoning

  1. 1Accelerating through 150V150\,\text{V} gives the electron kinetic energy K=eV=150eVK = eV = 150\,\text{eV}, far below mec2=5.11×105eVm_ec^2 = 5.11\times 10^{5}\,\text{eV}, so the nonrelativistic relation p=2mKp = \sqrt{2mK} is safe.
  2. 2Multiply that relation by cc to keep everything in electronvolts: pc=2mec2K=2(5.11×105eV)(150eV)pc = \sqrt{2m_ec^2K} = \sqrt{2(5.11\times 10^{5}\,\text{eV})(150\,\text{eV})}.
  3. 3Evaluate the product: 2(5.11×105)(150)=1.533×108eV22(5.11\times 10^{5})(150) = 1.533\times 10^{8}\,\text{eV}^2, so pc=1.238×104eVpc = 1.238\times 10^{4}\,\text{eV}.
  4. 4Divide into hchc: λ=h/p=hc/(pc)=(1240eVnm)/(1.238×104eV)=0.100nm\lambda = h/p = hc/(pc) = (1240\,\text{eV}\cdot\text{nm})/(1.238\times 10^{4}\,\text{eV}) = 0.100\,\text{nm}.
  5. 5Sanity-check the scale: 0.1nm0.1\,\text{nm} is one angstrom, comparable to atomic spacing in a crystal, which is exactly the regime in which electron diffraction patterns appear.

Why each choice is right or wrong

Choice A

This is hc/(mec2)=1240/(5.11×105)hc/(m_ec^2) = 1240/(5.11\times 10^{5}), the electron's Compton wavelength. It uses the rest energy in place of the momentum, so the accelerating voltage never enters the calculation at all.

Choice B

Correct. pc=2mec2K=2(5.11×105)(150)1.24×104eVpc = \sqrt{2m_ec^2K} = \sqrt{2(5.11\times 10^{5})(150)} \approx 1.24\times 10^{4}\,\text{eV}, so λ=hc/pc=1240/(1.24×104)0.10nm\lambda = hc/pc = 1240/(1.24\times 10^{4}) \approx 0.10\,\text{nm} — about one atomic spacing, which is why electron diffraction from crystals works.

Choice C

This drops the factor of 2 in p=2mKp = \sqrt{2mK} and uses pc=mec2K8.76×103eVpc = \sqrt{m_ec^2K} \approx 8.76\times 10^{3}\,\text{eV}. Losing that 2 inflates the wavelength by 2\sqrt{2}, which is the single most common slip in this calculation.

Choice D

This applies the photon relation λ=hc/E\lambda = hc/E with E=150eVE = 150\,\text{eV}, treating the electron as a massless quantum. For a massive particle the wavelength comes from momentum, and pcpc is far larger than KK when Kmc2K \ll mc^2.

Related formula

De Broglie wavelength of a slow massive particle

λ=hp,p=2mK\lambda = \frac{h}{p}, \quad p = \sqrt{2mK}

Assumptions: Nonrelativistic: K must be small compared with the rest energy mc^2. The particle has mass; a photon's wavelength comes from E = hc/lambda instead.

Electronvolt form of the momentum

pc=2(mc2)K,λ=hcpcpc = \sqrt{2(mc^2)K}, \quad \lambda = \frac{hc}{pc}

Assumptions: Working in eV and eV*nm avoids converting to SI units mid-problem. K = e times the accelerating potential difference only if the particle starts from rest and loses no energy on the way.

Related topic and practice

This worked example is free to read. A free account unlocks practice questions for this exam.

Sources

Authored for this public explainer registry. It has no database question ID and is not copied from a protected or official exam bank.

  1. University Physics Volume 3, Section 6.5: De Broglie's Matter WavesOpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-02. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.
  2. University Physics Volume 3, Section 6.2: Photoelectric EffectOpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-02. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.
Share this worked solution

Sources and corrections

Sources last checked 2026-08-15

Every source cited on this page was checked on the date shown, and we update the page when a source changes. If something looks wrong, tell us and we'll recheck it.