Question
A library extended its opening hours in May, and its monthly visits rose by 20%. The director concludes that the longer hours caused the increase. Which additional fact most weakens that conclusion?
- a.A nearby library closed for repairs throughout May.
- b.The library’s total monthly budget did not change.
- c.Several visitors said they appreciated the later closing time.
- d.The library has measured visits using the same counter for years.
- e.The director plans to keep the new hours in June.
Correct answer
A. A nearby library closed for repairs throughout May.
Full reasoning
- 1Separate the premise, a 20% rise after the schedule change, from the conclusion that the schedule change caused it.
- 2Look for another change that could account for the same observation.
- 3A nearby closure can redirect visitors, so it weakens the attribution to longer hours alone. It does not prove that longer hours had no effect.
- 4The other choices concern cost, approval, measurement consistency or a later decision. None provides an equally direct alternative explanation for the rise.
Why each choice is right or wrong
Choice A
Correct. Its visitors may have moved to this library, providing another explanation for the increase without denying that visits rose.
Choice B
An unchanged budget does not determine why visits increased; it does not isolate opening hours from other causes.
Choice C
This supports a possible benefit of the longer hours, so it does not directly challenge the proposed explanation.
Choice D
Consistent measurement makes the before-and-after comparison more credible, but does not identify its cause.
Choice E
A future policy decision provides no evidence about which change caused the observed increase in May.
Related formula
Related topic and practice
This worked example is free to read. A free account unlocks practice questions for this exam.
Sources
Original authored exercise; no database question ID and no protected or official exam-bank content. Specialist review pending.
- Introduction to Philosophy, Section 5.3: Arguments — OpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-03. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.
Sources and corrections
Sources last checked 2026-09-13Every source cited on this page was checked on the date shown, and we update the page when a source changes. If something looks wrong, tell us and we'll recheck it.