Question
A point charge sits at the center of an imaginary spherical Gaussian surface of radius . If the sphere's radius is doubled to while the charge stays fixed, what happens to the total electric flux through the sphere and the electric field magnitude at its surface?
- a. is unchanged and becomes
- b. becomes and becomes
- c. is unchanged and becomes
- d. doubles and becomes
Correct answer
A. is unchanged and becomes
Full reasoning
- 1By Gauss's law, depends only on the enclosed charge, so doubling the radius leaves the flux unchanged.
- 2The field of a point charge falls off as , so at it is one quarter of its value at .
- 3Consistency check: the sphere's area grows by while drops by 4, so the product — the flux — stays fixed.
Why each choice is right or wrong
Choice A
Correct. Gauss's law fixes the flux by the enclosed charge alone, while the point-charge field falls off as .
Choice B
This applies the inverse-square falloff to the flux as well, ignoring that the surface area grows by the same factor of 4 and exactly cancels it.
Choice C
This treats the field as falling off like , which is the behavior of an infinite line charge, not a point charge.
Choice D
This assumes a bigger sphere intercepts more field lines, but every line from the enclosed charge crosses any surrounding closed surface exactly once.
Related formula
Gauss's law
Assumptions: The surface is closed, so every field-line crossing is counted with its sign.
Point-charge field magnitude
Assumptions: The charge is at rest and treated as a point source.
Related topic and practice
This public explainer is separate from the protected practice bank. Current practice coverage varies.
Source and public-release record
Authored for this public explainer registry. It has no database question ID and is not copied from a protected or official exam bank.
- University Physics Volume 2, Section 6.2: Explaining Gauss's Law — OpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-02. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.
Review and maintenance
Source-checked by publisher- Publisher record
- Keiko Study editorial owner
- Publisher placeholder; no individual credential claim is made yet.
- Reviewer record
- Technical reviewer pending
- Placeholder only; this content is not labeled as reviewed by a named specialist.
- Last source check
- 2026-08-07
- Next scheduled review
- 2026-11-07
Recheck the cited OpenStax reference before each major GRE Physics preparation cycle.