Skip to content
GRE Physics overview

Worked example

Free to read

Counting Time and Relative Uncertainty

A public laboratory-methods question on Poisson counting statistics: how much longer a detector must run to halve the relative uncertainty in its total count.

Question

A detector records 10,00010{,}000 counts from a steady radioactive source in 5.0minutes5.0\,\text{minutes}. The counts obey Poisson statistics, so a total of NN counts carries an uncertainty N\sqrt{N}. Neglecting background and dead time, how long must the detector run to cut the relative uncertainty in the total count to half its 5.05.0-minute value?

  1. a.7.17.1 minutes
  2. b.1010 minutes
  3. c.2020 minutes
  4. d.8080 minutes

Correct answer

C. 2020 minutes

Full reasoning

  1. 1Find the starting relative uncertainty: σN=10,000=100\sigma_N = \sqrt{10{,}000} = 100 counts, so σN/N=100/10,000=0.0100\sigma_N/N = 100/10{,}000 = 0.0100, or 1.00%1.00\%.
  2. 2Write the target: half of that is 0.50%0.50\%, and the relative uncertainty of a Poisson total is σN/N=N/N=1/N\sigma_N/N = \sqrt{N}/N = 1/\sqrt{N}.
  3. 3Solve 1/N=0.00501/\sqrt{N} = 0.0050, so N=200\sqrt{N} = 200 and N=40,000N = 40{,}000 counts — four times the original total, because the relative uncertainty falls only as the square root.
  4. 4Convert counts back to time. The source is steady, so N=RtN = Rt with R=10,000/5.0=2000R = 10{,}000/5.0 = 2000 counts per minute, giving t=40,000/2000=20t = 40{,}000/2000 = 20 minutes.
  5. 5Check the result: 40,000=200\sqrt{40{,}000} = 200 counts of uncertainty on 40,00040{,}000 counts is exactly 0.50%0.50\%, half the original 1.00%1.00\%.

Why each choice is right or wrong

Choice A

This is 5.025.0\sqrt{2}, obtained by taking the square root of the improvement factor instead of squaring it. It inverts the rule: the counts must grow by the square of the factor by which the relative uncertainty falls, giving only about 0.84%0.84\% here.

Choice B

This assumes the relative uncertainty falls in direct proportion to the counting time, as 1/N1/N, so halving it would need twice the data. Poisson statistics give 1/N1/\sqrt{N}, and 20,00020{,}000 counts leave the relative uncertainty at about 0.71%0.71\%.

Choice C

Correct. The relative uncertainty is 1/N1/\sqrt{N}, so halving it needs 4×4\times the counts: N=40,000N = 40{,}000. At a steady rate the count total is proportional to time, so the run must last 4(5.0)=204(5.0) = 20 minutes.

Choice D

This applies the square-root rule twice, treating the relative uncertainty as falling like N1/4N^{-1/4} and demanding 24=162^4 = 16 times the counts. One square root separates counts from their relative uncertainty, not two.

Related formula

Poisson counting uncertainty

σN=N,σNN=1N\sigma_N = \sqrt{N}, \qquad \frac{\sigma_N}{N} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}

Assumptions: Events arrive independently at a steady average rate. Background counts and detector dead time are negligible.

Counts accumulated at a steady rate

N=RtN = Rt

Assumptions: The source activity does not decay appreciably over the run. Because N is proportional to t, quadrupling the counts means quadrupling the time.

Related topic and practice

This worked example is free to read. A free account unlocks practice questions for this exam.

Sources

Authored for this public explainer registry. It has no database question ID and is not copied from a protected or official exam bank.

  1. Introductory Statistics 2e, Section 4.6: Poisson DistributionOpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-15. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.
  2. University Physics Volume 1, Section 1.6: Significant FiguresOpenStax. Accessed 2026-08-15. OpenStax textbook content is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute and avoid verbatim reuse beyond short cited references.
Share this worked solution

Sources and corrections

Sources last checked 2026-08-15

Every source cited on this page was checked on the date shown, and we update the page when a source changes. If something looks wrong, tell us and we'll recheck it.