Skip to content

Reference · GRE subject tests

The mistakes GRE subject-test questions are built to catch.

A wrong answer on a subject test is not noise. Somebody wrote it, and wrote it to be chosen by a particular piece of muddled thinking. This page names 84 of those mistakes and counts how often the wrong answers in our own GRE Physics, Mathematics, and Psychology question bank were written to catch each one.

Read this first: what these numbers are, and what they are not

This is a classification of authored intent. Every practice item in our three GRE subject-test banks records, for each wrong option it offers, the specific error that would lead a student to pick it. This page counts those records. When it says an error accounts for 1,673 wrong answers, it means 1,673 wrong answers in this bank were written to catch it. That is a fact about how the questions were written and about nothing else.

It is not measured student performance. Nothing here comes from watching anyone take a test. There is no study, no sample, no analytics behind these figures. We are not claiming that any of these mistakes is common among real candidates, that any share of test-takers makes it, or that it costs anyone points. Those would be different claims needing different evidence, and we do not have that evidence.

The counts describe this question bank. They are the shape of one prep provider's writing across 2,509 items — its habits, its coverage, and its blind spots included. A different bank written against the same syllabus would produce different numbers. Nothing here describes the real exams, their item pool, or their design. Keiko Study is independent of ETS, and this page carries no endorsement from ETS or any other exam owner.

It is not finished and it is not validated. The list of 84 errors is what we have needed so far to name every wrong answer we have written; a longer bank would need more names. Nobody outside Keiko Study has reviewed it, and it has not been checked against any external dataset. We publish it because a stable, named vocabulary for wrong answers is more useful shared than kept, and because something written down can be argued with.

How the taxonomy was built

Writing a multiple-choice question is mostly writing the wrong answers. A distractor that nobody would pick is wasted; a good one is the exact output of a specific misunderstanding, so that choosing it tells you something. Our authoring model makes that explicit. Each item carries a set of rules, and a rule ties one offered wrong answer to one named error from a fixed list. Where an option is filler that no real reasoning produces, it is deliberately left unnamed rather than given a label that would not be true.

Across the three GRE subject tests that is 2,509 items carrying 9,279 named causes, drawn from 84 distinct errors. Each of the 84 has a stable code you can cite, a plain-language description, and a mapping onto one of four broader categories. The page you are reading is generated from that model on every deploy: no figure on it is typed by hand, and adding a question to the bank changes the numbers here without anyone editing this page.

One name is chosen per wrong answer, not several. Real mistakes are not always so tidy — a student can misread a condition and then misapply a rule — but a single named cause is what the model can support honestly, so that is what it records.

The shape of the list

The interesting split is not between subjects. It is between the errors that belong to a subject and the errors that belong to reading a question at speed. Thirteen of the 84 names are used by all three subject tests; the rest appear in exactly one.

Named errors by scope, and the wrong answers in this bank written to catch them
Where the name is usedNamed errorsWrong answers
All three subject tests135,307
GRE Physics only18788
GRE Math only29945
GRE Psychology only242,239

Counted by names, the subject-specific errors dominate. Counted by wrong answers, the shared ones do — the thirteen cross-exam names account for 5,307 of the 9,279 named causes in the bank. Reaching for a neighbouring definition, dropping a stated condition, and running a relationship the wrong way are not physics problems or psychology problems. They are what goes wrong when somebody who does know the material answers too quickly.

Four categories, and why the split matters

Every named error maps onto one of four broader codes. The distribution is the single most useful thing on this page for anyone deciding how to spend study time.

The four categories, the named errors mapped to each, and the wrong answers written to catch them
CategoryWhat it meansNamed errorsWrong answers
Concept gapconcept_gapThe response conflicts with a concept or relationship the item directly tests.554,910
Misread conditionmisread_conditionThe response is consistent with overlooking or changing an explicit condition in the prompt.61,733
Wrong methodwrong_methodThe response uses or selects an approach that cannot solve the stated task.171,440
Calculation or execution errorcalculation_executionThe selected method is compatible with the task, but an algebraic, arithmetic, logical, unit, or sign step fails.61,196

55 of the 84 names are conceptual — the student has the wrong idea about what something is or how it behaves. Only 6 are about executing a calculation. If you are deciding between drilling arithmetic accuracy and rebuilding the concepts underneath it, the questions themselves were mostly written for the second problem. That is a fact about the questions, not a measurement of your own error rate — but if you are choosing what to practise blind, it is the better bet.

The twenty most-written-for errors

Ranked by how many wrong answers in this bank were written to catch them. Again: this ranks our authoring, not anybody's mistakes.

The twenty named errors with the most wrong answers written to catch them, split by exam
Named errorPhysicsMathPsychologyTotal
Reached for a neighbouring definitionnamed_definition_confused4102471,0161,673
Dropped a condition the problem statedstated_condition_ignored14194283518
Used the relationship in the wrong directioninverse_relation_used_forward25955127441
Accepted an absolute where the real claim is qualifiedabsolute_claim_accepted——360360
Right method, wrong powerexponent_miscounted255966357
Substituted the wrong givenwrong_value_substituted12716546338
Reported a different quantity than the one asked fordifferent_quantity_reported13913743319
Treated the result as independent of the changedependence_ignored220460284
Left a factor out of the formulafactor_dropped_from_formula1421334279
Assigned the function to the wrong structurestructure_function_misassigned——256256
Combined the quantities with the wrong rulecombination_rule_misapplied1497514238
Leaned on a quantity that does not enterirrelevant_quantity_invoked9740101238
Lost or flipped a signsign_dropped_or_flipped1071168231
Applied the version of the rule that fits a different casewrong_case_of_rule_applied157528217
Right setup, slipped in the arithmeticarithmetic_slip211——211
Named a different school of psychologyschool_of_thought_confused——206206
Checked only part of the defining testdefining_test_incomplete—197—197
Swapped a construct with its partner termpaired_construct_swapped——179179
Stopped at an intermediate resultintermediate_result_reported71976174
Named a different research designresearch_design_misidentified——169169

Errors that are not about the subject

These 13 names are used by items in all three subject tests. A physics item and a psychology item have almost nothing in common, so when the same name explains a wrong answer in both, the mistake is not really about physics or psychology. It is about how a question gets read, how a relationship gets carried, and what gets dropped under time pressure.

That is the part of this list a tutor can use across subjects, and the part a student can work on without knowing any more content than they already do.

Reached for a neighbouring definition

named_definition_confused

The chosen answer names a closely related term or quantity rather than the one this item defines.

Say what the neighbouring term means and how it differs from this one. If you cannot state the difference in a sentence, the definition is not learned yet — it is only familiar.

1,673 wrong answers written to catch it · concept gap

Dropped a condition the problem stated

stated_condition_ignored

The chosen answer would be right if an explicitly stated condition or given value were not there.

Restate every condition the prompt gives in your own words, then check the option you chose still obeys all of them. The conditions are usually what makes one plausible answer wrong.

518 wrong answers written to catch it · misread condition

Used the relationship in the wrong direction

inverse_relation_used_forward

The chosen answer moves the result the way a direct relationship would, when the governing relationship is inverse (or the reverse).

Write the relationship as a proportionality before you compute, and decide from it whether the answer should get larger or smaller. Direction is a separate decision from magnitude, so make it separately.

441 wrong answers written to catch it · wrong method

Right method, wrong power

exponent_miscounted

The setup is sound but the quantity was raised to the wrong power, so the answer is off by a factor of the base.

Recount the power on every factor you changed, then check the size of the answer against the size of the change. Doubling a length and getting twice the volume is a caught error.

357 wrong answers written to catch it · calculation or execution error

Substituted the wrong given

wrong_value_substituted

The method is right, but a different number or symbol from the prompt was put into it.

Label each given with the symbol it belongs to before substituting anything. Two numbers of similar size cannot swap places if each is written next to its own symbol.

338 wrong answers written to catch it · misread condition

Reported a different quantity than the one asked for

different_quantity_reported

A correctly computed quantity was submitted, but not the one the prompt requested.

Write down the quantity being asked for before you start work, and check your last line against it. A correct answer to a question nobody asked still scores zero.

319 wrong answers written to catch it · misread condition

Treated the result as independent of the change

dependence_ignored

The chosen answer keeps the quantity fixed even though the thing that changed does control it.

Ask what the changed quantity actually controls and follow that chain one link at a time. Concluding that nothing moves is a claim, and it needs the same checking as any other.

284 wrong answers written to catch it · concept gap

Left a factor out of the formula

factor_dropped_from_formula

One of the multiplying factors in the governing formula never made it into the calculation.

Rebuild the formula from its definition, or from a units check, instead of recalling it whole. A missing factor is invisible in recall and obvious in a derivation.

279 wrong answers written to catch it · calculation or execution error

Combined the quantities with the wrong rule

combination_rule_misapplied

The right ingredients were used, but they were added, multiplied, or averaged where a different combination rule applies.

Decide how the quantities combine — added, multiplied, averaged, added in quadrature — before you combine them. Having the right ingredients is not the same as having the right recipe.

238 wrong answers written to catch it · wrong method

Leaned on a quantity that does not enter

irrelevant_quantity_invoked

The chosen answer makes the result hinge on something that cancels out or never appears in the governing relationship.

List the quantities that genuinely enter the governing relationship, then cross off the ones that cancel or never appear. A number being given does not mean it is used.

238 wrong answers written to catch it · concept gap

Lost or flipped a sign

sign_dropped_or_flipped

The magnitude is right and the direction is not: a minus sign was dropped, added, or reversed.

Fix a sign convention at the start and re-derive the sign of the final answer from that convention rather than from the arithmetic that produced it.

231 wrong answers written to catch it · calculation or execution error

Applied the version of the rule that fits a different case

wrong_case_of_rule_applied

A real rule was used, but the one that belongs to a neighbouring situation rather than the one described here.

Name the case you are in — which regime, which symmetry, which hypothesis holds — and then pick the version of the rule written for that case.

217 wrong answers written to catch it · wrong method

Stopped at an intermediate result

intermediate_result_reported

The work was correct up to a partial quantity, which was then reported instead of finishing the requested step.

Reread the final sentence of the prompt after you finish, and confirm the number on your page is the one it asks for rather than the one you needed on the way there.

174 wrong answers written to catch it · misread condition

GRE Physics error guide

Explore the named subject-specific errors, explanations and practical next steps for GRE Physics. Counts describe authored distractors in this bank, not measured learner performance.

GRE Math error guide

Explore the named subject-specific errors, explanations and practical next steps for GRE Math. Counts describe authored distractors in this bank, not measured learner performance.

GRE Psychology error guide

Explore the named subject-specific errors, explanations and practical next steps for GRE Psychology. Counts describe authored distractors in this bank, not measured learner performance.

The complete list

All 84 names with their stable codes, their category, and their counts. The codes do not change: if you cite one, it will still mean the same thing after the bank grows. Each name links to its description on this page or in its subject guide.

Every named error with its code, category, scope, and the wrong answers written to catch it
CodeNamed errorCategoryUsed byWrong answers
named_definition_confusedReached for a neighbouring definitionConcept gapAll three1,673
stated_condition_ignoredDropped a condition the problem statedMisread conditionAll three518
inverse_relation_used_forwardUsed the relationship in the wrong directionWrong methodAll three441
absolute_claim_acceptedAccepted an absolute where the real claim is qualifiedMisread conditionGRE Psychology360
exponent_miscountedRight method, wrong powerCalculation or execution errorAll three357
wrong_value_substitutedSubstituted the wrong givenMisread conditionAll three338
different_quantity_reportedReported a different quantity than the one asked forMisread conditionAll three319
dependence_ignoredTreated the result as independent of the changeConcept gapAll three284
factor_dropped_from_formulaLeft a factor out of the formulaCalculation or execution errorAll three279
structure_function_misassignedAssigned the function to the wrong structureConcept gapGRE Psychology256
combination_rule_misappliedCombined the quantities with the wrong ruleWrong methodAll three238
irrelevant_quantity_invokedLeaned on a quantity that does not enterConcept gapAll three238
sign_dropped_or_flippedLost or flipped a signCalculation or execution errorAll three231
wrong_case_of_rule_appliedApplied the version of the rule that fits a different caseWrong methodAll three217
arithmetic_slipRight setup, slipped in the arithmeticCalculation or execution errorGRE Physics211
school_of_thought_confusedNamed a different school of psychologyConcept gapGRE Psychology206
defining_test_incompleteChecked only part of the defining testConcept gapGRE Math197
paired_construct_swappedSwapped a construct with its partner termConcept gapGRE Psychology179
intermediate_result_reportedStopped at an intermediate resultMisread conditionAll three174
research_design_misidentifiedNamed a different research designWrong methodGRE Psychology169
power_law_exponent_droppedScaled by the factor instead of its power or rootWrong methodGRE Physics134
reliability_validity_confusedConfused reliability with validityConcept gapGRE Psychology132
stronger_property_assumedJustified it with a stronger property than holdsConcept gapGRE Math130
disorder_category_confusedPlaced the condition in the wrong diagnostic categoryConcept gapGRE Psychology122
limit_case_overextendedPushed the effect past the limit the conditions reachConcept gapGRE Physics109
statistic_misidentifiedNamed a different statisticConcept gapGRE Psychology108
theorist_misattributedCredited the work to the wrong researcherConcept gapGRE Psychology99
reciprocal_reportedReported the reciprocal of the quantity asked forCalculation or execution errorGRE Physics96
therapy_school_confusedDescribed a different school of therapyConcept gapGRE Psychology90
developmental_stage_misassignedPlaced the milestone in the wrong developmental stageConcept gapGRE Psychology85
available_states_miscountedCounted the available states or modes with the wrong ruleConcept gapGRE Physics78
boundary_case_misclassifiedGot the boundary case backwardsConcept gapGRE Math62
formula_variant_misrememberedRecalled a near-miss version of the standard formulaConcept gapGRE Math61
memory_system_misassignedNamed a different memory systemConcept gapGRE Psychology57
neurotransmitter_misassignedNamed the wrong neurotransmitterConcept gapGRE Psychology57
logical_form_alteredRearranged the quantifiers or the implicationConcept gapGRE Math46
correlation_read_as_causeRead an association as a causeWrong methodGRE Psychology45
sleep_stage_misassignedAssigned the feature to the wrong sleep stageConcept gapGRE Psychology41
stage_order_reversedPut the stages in the wrong orderConcept gapGRE Psychology41
convergence_test_misappliedLeaned on a test that decides nothing hereWrong methodGRE Math40
hormone_misassignedNamed the wrong hormoneConcept gapGRE Psychology39
memory_process_misassignedBlamed the wrong step of the memory processConcept gapGRE Psychology37
element_order_confused_with_group_orderConfused an element's order with the group's sizeConcept gapGRE Math35
nervous_system_division_confusedNamed a different division of the nervous systemConcept gapGRE Psychology34
conservation_law_violatedChose an outcome a conservation law forbidsConcept gapGRE Physics33
invariance_property_misjudgedMisjudged what the change leaves fixedConcept gapGRE Math31
derivative_rule_misappliedApplied the wrong calculus ruleWrong methodGRE Math29
limit_taken_by_naive_substitutionRead the limit straight off the substitutionWrong methodGRE Math26
reinforcement_contingency_swappedSwapped what the consequence adds or takes awayConcept gapGRE Psychology25
matrix_entries_misreadTook the numbers from the wrong positionsMisread conditionGRE Math24
prime_power_condition_misappliedMisapplied the prime-power testConcept gapGRE Math24
unit_zero_divisor_confusedConfused invertible elements with zero divisorsConcept gapGRE Math24
normalization_step_omittedNever divided by the normalising quantityCalculation or execution errorGRE Math22
operation_table_property_confusedNamed a different algebraic axiomConcept gapGRE Math20
second_law_direction_ignoredLet heat run the way the second law forbidsConcept gapGRE Physics20
treatment_indication_confusedMatched the treatment to the wrong conditionConcept gapGRE Psychology19
complex_polar_form_confusedMixed up modulus and argumentConcept gapGRE Math18
galilean_addition_usedAdded the speeds the way everyday velocities addWrong methodGRE Physics18
integration_differentiation_swappedRan the operation in the opposite directionWrong methodGRE Math18
symmetry_argument_missedMissed the symmetry that settles the integralConcept gapGRE Math18
trace_determinant_swappedSwapped trace and determinantConcept gapGRE Math18
countability_misjudgedMisjudged which set can be listedConcept gapGRE Math17
permutation_used_for_combinationCounted ordered arrangements where order does not matterWrong methodGRE Math16
vector_product_direction_confusedPointed a vector product the wrong wayConcept gapGRE Physics16
chain_rule_factor_omittedSkipped the derivative of the inside functionWrong methodGRE Math14
intensity_coded_by_spike_sizeRead stimulus intensity off the size of the impulseConcept gapGRE Psychology14
rank_nullity_dimension_confusedPut the wrong dimension into rank-nullityWrong methodGRE Math14
autonomic_division_swappedSwapped the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisionsConcept gapGRE Psychology12
conditioning_paradigm_confusedMixed up the two kinds of conditioningConcept gapGRE Psychology12
lattice_type_confusedRecalled the count for a different latticeConcept gapGRE Physics11
mass_distribution_misjudgedJudged rotation by mass alone, not where the mass sitsConcept gapGRE Physics11
unaffected_quantity_treated_as_changingAssumed something changed that the setup leaves fixedConcept gapGRE Physics11
pointwise_uniform_convergence_confusedConfused pointwise with uniform convergenceConcept gapGRE Math10
absolute_conditional_convergence_confusedConfused absolute with conditional convergenceConcept gapGRE Math9
cross_product_angle_misusedUsed the wrong angle factor in a vector force lawWrong methodGRE Physics9
propagation_aligned_with_fieldAssumed the wave travels along one of its fieldsConcept gapGRE Physics9
equilibrium_stability_reversedRead the stability of the equilibrium backwardsConcept gapGRE Math8
rate_confused_with_valueRead the effect off the value instead of its rate of changeConcept gapGRE Physics8
series_parallel_swappedSwapped the series and parallel rulesWrong methodGRE Physics8
path_dependence_misjudgedMisjudged whether the answer depends on the pathConcept gapGRE Math6
absolute_temperature_not_usedUsed the Celsius reading where the law needs kelvinWrong methodGRE Physics4
algebraic_geometric_multiplicity_confusedConfused algebraic with geometric multiplicityConcept gapGRE Math4
growth_model_linearizedTreated compounding change as linearConcept gapGRE Math4
intensity_confused_with_photon_energyTreated brighter light as more energetic per photonConcept gapGRE Physics2

Using this, and arguing with it

Tutors and advisors are welcome to use these names, quote the descriptions, and link to the codes; each code has a stable anchor and a linked description. If you reproduce the counts, say what they count — wrong answers written to catch an error in one provider's bank — so the number does not travel as a claim about test-takers. That misreading is the only way this page can do harm.

If a name is wrong, badly drawn, or missing, say so. The most likely faults are the ones we cannot see from inside: names that split a single real mistake into two, names that collapse two different mistakes into one, and gaps where our bank simply has not covered a topic well enough to need a name yet.

Everything on this page is derived from the model that drives our practice. If the list changes, this page changes with it, and the codes stay stable so an old citation still resolves.